# C# and var keyword

C# 3.0 introduced us new language feature: type inference using keyword var. Some guys think that var in C# is same thing as var in PHP. That’s wrong – var keyword in C# is totally different thing and it doesn’t mean that C# has now support for type changing class attributes. Let’s prove it.

I will use very simple example code here but it makes the point perfectly clear later. So here’s the code.

class Program{    static void Main(string[] args)    {        string name = "Compilers";        var name2 = "Compilers";    }}

Now let’s see what happen if we compile this code. If var doesn’t mean type inference and it is therefore something different then compiler doesn’t produce two analogous code blocks for variables we declared. Compiler creates the following IL code.

.method private hidebysig static void  Main(string[] args) cil managed {   .entrypoint   // Code size       14 (0xe)   .maxstack  1   .locals init ([0] string name,            [1] string name2)   IL_0000:  nop   IL_0001:  ldstr      "Compiler"   IL_0006:  stloc.0   IL_0007:  ldstr      "Compiler"   IL_000c:  stloc.1   IL_000d:  ret } // end of method Program::Main

If we look at this code we will see that there are two local variables declared as string: name and name2. These are the same variabled we declared before. So their types are correct. If we look at the code where assignments are made we can see that these assignments are very similiar, so there is no additional activities made in the case of variable declared with keyword var.

If we try to compile something like this

void SomeMethod() {     var x = null;     var y; }

we will get errors because on first line we are using null and null has no type. Second line gives error because there is no type specified and therefore there is nothing to infere.

So, I think now you believe me if I say that kayword var in C# is not same thing as var in PHP 🙂

### 4 thoughts on “C# and var keyword”

• Bharath Reddy VasiReddy says:

Thats nice stuff to read. Thankyou.

Thanks

Bharath Reddy VasiReddy

• Json says:

How does the keyword var make code more readable? If anything it makes code non deterministic. This is nice for the dynamic natures of Lambda and LINQ expressions, but it does NOT make code more clear. If another programmer comes along 2 years later are they going to really understand what type is assigned to a var variable without first digging deep into what is returned? There are tons of blogs out there highlighting why you should NOT use var outside of dynamic languages and structures. In most scenarios specifying the type is preferred over var.

• JeremyW says:

By the way, null can be assigned to var as long as type inference can be determined by the expression such as:

vat x = null as object;

However you might as well say:

object x = null;

It’s shorter and clearer anyways.